Top

Thermal Interface Materials

New CSI 25 / Thermal Interface Materials
isotherm plate

Thermal Interface Materials (TIMs) for Heatsinks

Types · Capabilities · Benefits · Applications

5

Why TIMs matter (quick reality check)

No matter how flat a heatsink and device look, microscopic air gaps exist. Air is a terrible thermal conductor.
TIMs replace trapped air with a material that conducts heat efficiently from:

  • IC / power device → heatsink
  • Cold plate → power module
  • PCB component → chassis

1. Thermal Grease / Thermal Paste

(Silicone or non-silicone based)

Capabilities

  • Thermal conductivity: ~3 to 12 W/m·K (some higher-end pastes exceed this)
  • Very thin bond line (excellent contact)
  • Handles surface roughness well

Benefits

  • Best all-around thermal performance for the cost
  • Low thermal resistance
  • Easy to apply (manual or automated)

Limitations

  • Can pump out over thermal cycling
  • Messy, not structural
  • Not ideal for vertical or high-shock environments

Typical Applications

  • CPUs, GPUs
  • Power transistors (TO-247, TO-220)
  • Prototyping and lab validation

Verdict
👉 Best performance, lowest cost, lowest mechanical stability.

2. Thermal Pads (Gap Pads / Elastomer Pads)

Capabilities

  • Thermal conductivity: ~1 to 8 W/m·K (advanced pads up to ~12)
  • Thickness: 0.25 mm to 5+ mm
  • Compressible (fills gaps)

Benefits

  • Clean, consistent, reworkable
  • Electrically insulating
  • Absorbs tolerance stack-ups

Limitations

  • Higher thermal resistance than grease
  • Compression force matters
  • Can age/harden over time

Typical Applications

  • Power electronics
  • LED modules
  • Telecom and industrial electronics
  • High-volume manufacturing

Verdict
👉 Best balance of performance, manufacturability, and reliability.

3. Phase Change Materials (PCM)

Capabilities

  • Solid at room temperature, flows at ~50–65 °C
  • Thermal conductivity: ~2 to 6 W/m·K
  • Thin bond line after phase change

Benefits

  • Clean handling (no mess during assembly)
  • Low pump-out compared to grease
  • Consistent performance over time

Limitations

  • Requires operating temperature to activate
  • Not ideal for low-power devices
  • Slightly higher cost than grease

Typical Applications

  • CPUs in OEM systems
  • Automotive electronics
  • Long-life industrial products

Verdict
👉 Grease-like performance with better long-term stability.

4. Thermally Conductive Adhesives (Epoxy / Acrylic / Silicone)

Capabilities

  • Thermal conductivity: ~1 to 4 W/m·K
  • Structural bonding + heat transfer
  • Permanent attachment

Benefits

  • Eliminates clips, screws, fasteners
  • Vibration-resistant
  • Good for compact designs

Limitations

  • Permanent (no rework)
  • Lower thermal performance than grease/pads
  • Cure time affects manufacturing flow

Typical Applications

  • LED lighting
  • Small electronics
  • Cost-sensitive consumer devices

Verdict
👉 When mechanical attachment matters more than peak thermal performance.

5. Liquid Metal TIMs (Advanced / Niche)

Capabilities

  • Thermal conductivity: 20–70+ W/m·K
  • Ultra-low thermal resistance

Benefits

  • Best thermal performance available
  • Ideal for extreme heat flux

Limitations

  • Electrically conductive (risk!)
  • Corrosive to aluminum
  • Hard to handle, not production-friendly

Typical Applications

  • Enthusiast CPUs
  • Aerospace / specialty R&D
  • Not recommended for standard heatsinks

Verdict
👉 Amazing performance, terrible manufacturability.

Quick Selection Guide

Application Best TIM Choice
CPU / GPU Thermal grease or PCM
Power electronics Thermal pads
LEDs Adhesive or pads
Automotive PCM or high-reliability pads
Prototyping Thermal grease
High vibration Pads or adhesive

Practical Engineering Advice (real-world)

  • Flat surfaces + controlled pressure → grease or PCM
  • Tolerance stack-ups → pads
  • High volume manufacturing → pads or PCM
  • Field reliability > peak performance → avoid grease

Thermal Grease

Heatsink Gap Filler
THIN MEGA FLAT HEAT PIPE